.png)
Compare For
Similar Fields
Premium access required for this page.
Please explore our plans
Adelaide's Welfare-Dependent Enclaves: A Ranking of Suburbs by Aggregate Data
The total number of families, with children, who are low-income and financially dependent upon welfare payment.The data on welfare dependent families in different suburbs can be useful for property investors and those looking to move as it provides insights into the livability of a particular area. For instance, if a suburb has a high percentage of welfare dependent families, it may indicate a lack of job opportunities or a struggling economy, which could impact property values and rental yields. On the other hand, if a suburb has a low percentage of welfare dependent families, it may suggest a more stable and prosperous community, which could make it an attractive location for property investment or relocation. Additionally, this data could also be useful for those interested in social issues and community development, as it highlights areas that may require additional support and resources to improve the well-being of residents. Data from 2021
| Area | Value |
|---|---|
| 1. Playford | 3070 |
| 2. Salisbury | 2750 |
| 3. Onkaparinga | 2570 |
| 4. Port Adelaide Enfield | 1790 |
| 5. Charles Sturt | 1290 |
| 6. Marion | 909 |
| 7. Tea Tree Gully | 836 |
| 8. Gawler | 396 |
| 9. West Torrens | 389 |
| 10. Mount Barker | 328 |
|
11. |
300 |
|
12. |
247 |
|
13. |
216 |
|
14. |
191 |
|
15. |
172 |
|
16. |
169 |
|
17. |
159 |
|
18. |
139 |
|
19. |
129 |
|
20. |
107 |
|
21. |
106 |
|
22. |
27 |
