.png)
Compare For
Similar Fields
Premium access required for this page.
Please explore our plans
Uncovering the Hidden Crime: Other Theft in (Geelong) Suburbs from 2017-2021
Stealing offences which do not involve fair evasion, theft from motor vehicles, retail stores or bicycles, or the receiving and/or handling of stolen goods. The data was collected and summed over a four year period from 2017-2021. Data from 2021| Area | Value |
|---|---|
| 1. Avalon | 1 incident per 3.43 residents |
| 2. Geelong | 1 incident per 9.43 residents |
| 3. South Geelong | 1 incident per 9.48 residents |
| 4. Moolap | 1 incident per 9.86 residents |
| 5. North Geelong | 1 incident per 11.7 residents |
| 6. North Shore (Vic.) | 1 incident per 12 residents |
| 7. Breakwater | 1 incident per 16.3 residents |
| 8. Newcomb | 1 incident per 17.9 residents |
| 9. Mount Moriac | 1 incident per 18.3 residents |
| 10. Norlane | 1 incident per 19.8 residents |
|
11. |
1 incident per 20.6 residents |
|
12. |
1 incident per 21.3 residents |
|
13. |
1 incident per 23.1 residents |
|
14. |
1 incident per 27.1 residents |
|
15. |
1 incident per 28.3 residents |
|
16. |
1 incident per 29.6 residents |
|
17. |
1 incident per 31.7 residents |
|
18. |
1 incident per 33 residents |
|
19. |
1 incident per 34.9 residents |
|
20. |
1 incident per 39.1 residents |
|
21. |
1 incident per 39.2 residents |
|
22. |
1 incident per 39.7 residents |
|
23. |
1 incident per 40.4 residents |
|
24. |
1 incident per 44.5 residents |
|
25. |
1 incident per 45.7 residents |
|
26. |
1 incident per 49.4 residents |
|
27. |
1 incident per 50 residents |
|
28. |
1 incident per 51.2 residents |
|
29. |
1 incident per 52 residents |
|
30. |
1 incident per 52.7 residents |
|
31. |
1 incident per 53.8 residents |
|
32. |
1 incident per 55.6 residents |
|
33. |
1 incident per 58 residents |
|
34. |
1 incident per 58.1 residents |
|
35. |
1 incident per 62.9 residents |
|
36. |
1 incident per 63 residents |
|
37. |
1 incident per 63 residents |
|
38. |
1 incident per 68.5 residents |
|
39. |
1 incident per 72 residents |
|
40. |
1 incident per 73.7 residents |
|
41. |
1 incident per 73.9 residents |
|
42. |
1 incident per 81.7 residents |
|
43. |
1 incident per 82.5 residents |
|
44. |
1 incident per 85 residents |
|
45. |
1 incident per 85.7 residents |
|
46. |
1 incident per 86.1 residents |
|
47. |
1 incident per 86.8 residents |
|
48. |
1 incident per 89 residents |
|
49. |
1 incident per 89.1 residents |
|
50. |
1 incident per 90.3 residents |
|
51. |
1 incident per 90.6 residents |
|
52. |
1 incident per 90.7 residents |
|
53. |
1 incident per 93.9 residents |
|
54. |
1 incident per 97.3 residents |
|
55. |
1 incident per 106 residents |
|
56. |
1 incident per 113 residents |
|
57. |
1 incident per 119 residents |
|
58. |
1 incident per 122 residents |
|
59. |
1 incident per 123 residents |
|
60. |
1 incident per 125 residents |
|
61. |
1 incident per 129 residents |
|
62. |
1 incident per 132 residents |
|
63. |
1 incident per 133 residents |
|
64. |
1 incident per 134 residents |
|
65. |
1 incident per 139 residents |
|
66. |
1 incident per 145 residents |
|
67. |
1 incident per 148 residents |
|
68. |
1 incident per 168 residents |
|
69. |
1 incident per 173 residents |
|
70. |
1 incident per 182 residents |
|
71. |
1 incident per 193 residents |
|
72. |
1 incident per 200 residents |
|
73. |
1 incident per 208 residents |
|
74. |
1 incident per 211 residents |
|
75. |
1 incident per 224 residents |
|
76. |
1 incident per 266 residents |
|
77. |
1 incident per 277 residents |
|
78. |
1 incident per 388 residents |
