People & Lifestyle Scamander Tas 7215

What Kind of People Live in Scamander TAS 7215?

Diversity Levels in Scamander

The proportion of the population who are not 3rd+ generation Anglo-Australians
Sources: ABS, TORREN and Microburbs, 2006 - 2023

Scamander

13.9%

Launceston and North East Tas

20.6%

Compare
Suburbs

Field	Value	VS Launceston and North East Tas	Trend
Median age	51	Top 25%	12% to Jan 2021
Net overseas migration (LGA)	Premium	Premium	Premium
Australian Aboriginal	3.4%	Top 28%	to Dec 2021
Overseas born parents	13.0%	Bottom 42%	10% to Dec 2021

Quality of Life in Scamander

Full Scamander Liveability Report

Sample Report

The proportion of residents who enjoy a healthy, satisfying life.
Sources: ABS, AIHW, DSS, GEOSPATIAL, GOOGLE, TORREN and Microburbs, 2006 - 2045

Scamander

65.0%

Launceston and North East Tas

70.6%

Compare
Suburbs

Field	Value	VS Launceston and North East Tas	Trend
Healthcare Coverage Index	1	Bottom 17%	Data for Jun 2023
Life satisfaction score (SA2)	78	Bottom 21%	Data for Dec 2016
Lifestyle Score	75.0	Top 38%	Data for May 2023
Mental Health Score	43.0	Top 19%	Data for May 2023
Physical Health	97.6%	Top 20%	Data for May 2023

Conservatism in Scamander

The proportion of the population who hold traditional values.
Sources: ABS, AEC and Microburbs, 2006 - 2023

Scamander

26.6%

Launceston and North East Tas

31.4%

Compare
Suburbs

Field	Value	VS Launceston and North East Tas	Trend
% Religious	39.0%	Bottom 11%	Data for May 2023
Intact families	74.0%	Bottom 31%	13% to Jan 2021
Support for: Right Wing Parties (federal level)	40.7%	Bottom 27%	Data for Dec 2022

Convenience Score in Scamander

Scamander Amenities Map

Sample Graphic

The higher the score, the faster the travel time to regular amenities like work and shopping and the easier it is to access them without private cars.
Sources: ABS, GEOSPATIAL, TORREN and Microburbs, 2006 - 2023

Scamander

63.0

Launceston and North East Tas

69.3

Compare
Suburbs

Field	Value	VS Launceston and North East Tas	Trend
Public transport commuters	0.0%	Bottom 35%	Data for Dec 2021
Vehicles per household	1.9	Bottom 43%	6% to Jan 2021
Bicycle commuters	0.0%	Bottom 38%	Data for Dec 2021
Distance to the nearest city	120 km	Top 13%	Data for Mar 2023
Walk commuters	6.2%	Top 24%	13% to Dec 2021

Hip Score in Scamander

Scamander Hip Score & Guide

Sample Report

The higher the score, the more fashionable and lively an area is: a trendy, progressive population with easy access to nightlife and culture.
Sources: ABS, AEC, GOOGLE and Microburbs, 2006 - 2023

Scamander

67.0

Launceston and North East Tas

60.7

Compare
Suburbs

Field	Value	VS Launceston and North East Tas	Trend
Gay marriage support (CED)	59%	Bottom 34%	Data for Nov 2017
Hip Venues	0	Bottom 27%	Data for Aug 2023
Late Night Venues	0.0	Bottom 43%	Data for May 2023
No religion	61.5%	Top 11%	88% to Jan 2021
Postgraduates	2.2%	Top 36%	306% to Dec 2021
Potentially Hip Demographics	54.0%	Top 13%	1% to Jan 2021
Support for: Left Wing Parties (federal level)	42.8%	Top 26%	Data for Dec 2022
Visitors	0.0%	Bottom 37%	to 0 to Jan 2021

Community Score in Scamander

Scamander Community Report

Sample Report

The higher the score, the more time residents spend contributing the local community and the more connected residents are to their community.
Sources: ABS, GOOGLE and Microburbs, 2006 - 2023

Scamander

85.0

Launceston and North East Tas

85.9

Compare
Suburbs

Field	Value	VS Launceston and North East Tas	Trend
Community Groups	1.0	Top 28%	Data for May 2023
Community support (LGA)	95.7%	Top 23%	Data for Dec 2014
Volunteers	31.9%	Bottom 44%	18% to Jan 2021

Family Score in Scamander

Scamander School and Park Map

Sample Graphic

The higher the score, the more suitable the suburb is to families with children: good schools, safe, plentiful families, child-friendly amenities like playgrounds
Sources: ABS, DSS, TORREN and Microburbs, 2006 - 2023

Scamander

24.0

Launceston and North East Tas

70.4

Compare
Suburbs

Field	Value	VS Launceston and North East Tas	Trend
Total children in preschool (LGA)	67	Bottom 34%	11% to Dec 2020
Family households	63.2%	Bottom 29%	10% to Jan 2021
Stay at home mothers	2.5%	Bottom 39%	12% to Dec 2021
Parenting payment recipients (single) (Postcode)	Premium	Premium	Premium